Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit Dale S's column >>

DALE S

Articles Posted: 5  Links Seeded: 12
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 10/24/2011

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

The French Lesson in Health Care

Seeded on Tue Mar 9, 2010 10:14 AM EST
Read ArticleArticle Source: Business Week
health, health-care, health-care-reform, health-care-debate
Seeded by Dale S
Advertise | AdChoices

I found this article from Business Week, hardly a liberal publication. It details how and why France has the Number 1 rated Health Care system in the world.

It also makes the case that it's the closest kind of system as ours, so the assertion is that we could have this.

Of course, the mindset of Americans is and always will be the core problem. We're the best, everyone in any other country is inferior, etc. If that doesn't change, and soon, we're doomed here. Someday of course, it WILL change, but hopefully before we're rated LAST in Health Care (we're 37th now, folks, and we're NOT rising!) and people are dying in the streets, like some 3rd world country.

I would ask those vehemently against health care reform to read this with an open mind. Please share what you like and dislike from their model, but try to be constructive. Heck, maybe the Newsvine community will come up with an idea that will push our system forward!

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • Dale S's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (15)
Dale S

This article has a lot of good info in it. At least for those that can see that America does NOT have a monopoly on ideas. If possible, I'd like this to be a discussion about what might work and what might not work here, not a left-right thing. If we can't get off that in America, we deserve the fate we get.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Mar 9, 2010 10:18 AM EST
Arad

But it's FRENCH. It's unacceptable as a system and it offends my American sensibilities. (Rename it with 'Patriot' or 'Freedom' instead of FRENCH and I'll endorse it whole-heartedly) >_>

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Tue Mar 9, 2010 12:10 PM EST
Dale S

But it's FRENCH. It's unacceptable...

Yeah, amazing, huh? I find it so interesting that so many hate the very country that, with their help and assistance, helped America in it's present form to exist. We have such short memories.

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Tue Mar 9, 2010 12:24 PM EST
Reply
Bob Nelson.

As a Franco-American double-national, resident in France for nearly forty years... I usually find such articles to be oversimplified to the point of uselessness. But this one is actually quite good!

  • 1 vote
Reply#3 - Tue Mar 9, 2010 12:40 PM EST
Dale S

Thanks, Bob, it helps to have someone that actually has lived something contribute. Now, if we could work on the "bumper-sticker thinking" you spoke about, we might get somewhere!

  • 1 vote
Reply#4 - Tue Mar 9, 2010 2:38 PM EST
Smokin Joe-1059435

Dale, please tell me how France, in WWII helped us become the nation we are?  In addition, they fought here against the Brits. because they had so hatred the Brits. so much and wanted to stop

the British from further expanding their rule.

 

 

    Reply#5 - Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:45 PM EST
    Dale S

    Dale, please tell me how France, in WWII helped us become the nation we are? In addition, they fought here against the Brits. because they had so hatred the Brits. so much and wanted to stop the British from further expanding their rule.

    Joe, what in the Hell does your comment have to do with this topic? So your assertion is that because France did not WIN WW2, they can't possibly have any good ideas. Is that right? Did you even READ the article?!!! You couldn't have, if that's the only response you could come up with.

    We destroyed Japan in WW2 also. They had nothing to do with us "becoming the nation we are". But, like it or not, they LEAD THE WORLD in quality and innovation in automotive and electronics design. They have so many more good ideas than we do they can't be counted! Much of the same goes for Germany too.

    Simply because of the realities of what happened 70 years ago in history has ZERO to do with what France is doing with their health care.

    It's thinking like yours that makes it impossible to have any new ideas in this country, and why we are getting pummeled in the global economy.

    Bob, more "Bumper Sticker Thinking", eh?!!!

    • 1 vote
    #5.1 - Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:14 PM EST
    WakeUpPeople-1385514

    Joe, you need to go back a couple hundred years in history and look at the REVOLUTIONARY WAR and the period after it, not WWII. France was a key ally for us and loaned us a lot of money and sold us a lot of weapons, without which, we would not have been able to defeat the british. A lot of historians will agree that without France, the US wouldn't exist today.

      #5.2 - Thu Aug 19, 2010 4:11 PM EDT
      Reply
      Smokin Joe-1059435

      I am also 100% against our government meddling in any form of healthcare. Has no one learned that our leaders are corrupt and botch every plan because they want to know "what am I getting?".

      • 1 vote
      Reply#6 - Wed Mar 10, 2010 7:52 PM EST
      Dale S

      I am also 100% against our government meddling in any form of healthcare. Has no one learned that our leaders are corrupt and botch every plan because they want to know "what am I getting?".

      Deep, Joe. way to delve into the substance of the article I went to the trouble to post. Your searing expose of the facts is impressive.

      • 1 vote
      #6.1 - Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:27 PM EST
      Reply
      WakeUpPeople-1385514

      It was a good article. I am a huge fan of the french healthcare system. But one thing they don't really talk that much about in the article is how it could be unsustainable. They mention at the end the national insurance is $13.5 billion in the red and has been in the red since 1985!

      I have a feeling something like a national HSA plan is going to end up being the way to go. I've been using an HSA for the last couple years now and I love it! A government run HSA here in the US I think would do a lot of good. It would force people to save and the savings would be tax free, the premiums for HSA are substantially lower than an HMO (about half) and you get the coverage of a PPO. To me, having done it for the last couple years, it's a no brainer! HSA's are the way to go.

      For those that don't know about them, basically, you get a yearly out of pocket deductable. Mine is $2000. So, for any medical expenses you incur, you pay 100% of the cost up to $2000 in one year. After you hit the $2000 mark, EVERYTHING is covered 100%.

      Well, you might say, "that sucks, who has $2000!?!?!"... and this is where it gets good. Banks now have "HSA Bank Accounts". I have mine with Chase but most banks offer them. You are allowed to put up to $3000 a year into your HSA bank account TAX FREE (for now anyway, Obama is trying to do away with that). Once you get $2000 in the account, you can invest it in mutual funds just like a 401K or IRA. The money in this account is YOURS. They give you a Visa check card and you use that to pay for any medical expenses. AFter a couple years, you'll easily have maybe $1000 or $2000 in there... But you continue to pay into it every paycheck. So it just grows and grows...

      But you will never have to spend more than $2000 out of it if you ever get really sick or have a medical emergency. And the money in the HSA bank account stays with you for life. It never goes away. And even if you leave the HSA plan, you can still use your HSA bank account to pay for medical expenses. And since you can invest the money, it can earn 10% or 12% on the open market!!! So it grows that much quicker.

      For my example, at my company, the HMO cost the company $500 a month and was offered to employees free of charge. The PPO was $750 a month, and was offered to the employees at a fee of $250/month. The HSA PPO cost the company $250/month and was offered free of charge. So I took the $250/month I WAS paying for the PPO, and put it into the HSA account. After two years I have about $10,000 in there (I moved a bunch of the money into mutual funds). If I ever get really sick, I'll only have to pay $2000 max out of it before the insurance kicks in and covers everything. So I'm covered now no matter what.

      No more of this 80/20 crap and no more co-pays. And the other interesting thing I've been finding out... most doctors and specialists will give you a pretty good discount if they know you are paying out of your own pocket (which you are when you use your HSA bank account). So now instead of $100 office visits, they are $45 for me. Funny how that works!!!

      Anyway... I think the answer to our national healthcare problem might be to start a national HSA plan, with our premium coming out of the taxes we already pay!!! I'm sure it would get more complicated than what my situation is... but I think it would be good for all. We would all get to save and not feel like the money we pay for insurance just "disappears", we have a guarantee that 100% of major illnesses will be covered. And the government only has to pay for those that are really sick, everyone else is paying for themselves out of their HSA accounts... and then it helps the economy and stock market since everyone is saving money in their HSA accounts and investing that money in mutual funds.

      If kids start doing an HSA when they are 18, by the time they are 50 and start having more serious health problems they'll have the money to pay for it. We might then be able to completely do away with medicare and have people just use their HSA accounts for health care when they get older.

      Do a google search for a compounding interest calculator.

      If you start with $0.00, and put $3000 in an investment account every year for 38 years (50yrs old - 18 yrs old = 38 yrs), if it yields an 8% return you'll have $660,000 by the time you are 50. If it only yields a 5% return you'll still have $323,000!!! OK, so lets say at 18 you can't really put $3000 into it every year, maybe only $1000 a year to start. If you do $1000 a year for 38 yrs at 5% it comes out to around $107,000, which is still really good and could handle paying for a lot of the health problems one might have as we get older.

      Anyway...that's my $0.02. I don't understand why more people don't do an HSA PPO plan.

      Also, for families, I didn't mention this... the deductible is usually higher depending on the number of dependents. It can be as low as $3500 for you and a spouse, or as much as $6000 or $7000 for a family of 5. BUT!!! you are then allowed to put more into your HSA savings account too. So after a couple years you'll have more than enough in the HSA bank account to cover your out of pocket expenses every year.

      • 1 vote
      Reply#7 - Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:04 PM EDT
      WakeUpPeople-1385514

      Also I should point out that this would take the government OUT of the more mundane day-to-day healthcare and checkups and would only bring them in for the serious illnesses.

      And it would keep our money OUT of the hands of the politicians. As we have seen from Social Security and other federally run social services, the government likes to take that money and to other things with it...then turn around and say there is no more money and we need to pay more taxes to cover the deficit.

      not that this wouldn't happen with national healthcare even if it is an HSA plan, but there would be a substantially smaller portion of our money going into the government's general fund and making its way from it's designated destination as health insurance, into government union pension contracts and whatnot.

        #7.1 - Thu Aug 19, 2010 5:17 PM EDT
        Dale S

        Lots of good stuff here, WakeUp! I need to learn more about HSA's. I thought if you didn't use it by the end of the year it was toast. I am pretty sure it USED to be that way.

          #7.2 - Fri Aug 20, 2010 10:16 AM EDT
          WakeUpPeople-1385514

          What you are thinking of is different. I know what you are talking about, those are called "flexible spending accounts" and their money doesn't roll over year after year. If you don't use the money by the end of the year you lose it. With HSAs, you never lose the money. Here are some links...

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_savings_account

          http://www.ustreas.gov/offices/public-affairs/hsa/faq_basics.shtml

          http://www.hsaeducator.com/what-is-an-hsa-know-about-what-is-a-health-savings-account/

          https://www.wellsfargo.com/investing/hsa/index

          https://www.chase.com/index.jsp?pg_name=ccpmapp/shared/assets/page/hsa_faqs

          http://www.bankofamerica.com/state.cgi?section=generic&update=&cookiecheck=yes&destination=nba/hsaaccts/index.cfm?template=overview

          Honestly, to me this seems like the best choice for a government option. We all end up paying the premium (which is much lower than a normal premium for an HMO), and we get tax breaks to save up our own money to pay for our own healthcare. The government coverage only comes into play when we have major issues, and those issues are covered 100%. So the government doesn't have to deal with paying out money every time we get a cold or flu, but can still offer coverage to those who might not be able to afford the expenses of cancer treatment, surgery, etc...

          This is where the partisan politics then starts to come into play... those that want a bigger government might be against this because they want the government to be involved every time you need a tylenol. Those that want a smaller government would be for this because it will require a much smaller department to deal with just the payouts of the bigger medical problems people have.

          It is kind of like the french system, where the healthy pay for the sick. But, it's not that the healthy pay for the mildly sick (with strep throat or a cold), it's that the healthy pay for people that are really sick and need help.

          This would also give us, the "medical consumer" the ability to shop around for medical services and keep prices down by creating a competitive market. If you need a flu shot and you call your dr to setup an appointment and you ask how much and they tell you $250... Then you call your friend's dr's office adn they say $125... which one are you going to go to? Since it is your money you are spending out of your own HSA account, obviously you are going to go to the cheaper one. And the doctors that are just out to make money and charge crazy fees will go away... except for the ones consumers feel are really worth it.

          I've been to a bunch of doctors near where I live before I found the one I go to now. all of them were pretty much a joke. I literally felt like I was on a tech support call. They all just go through the "standard questions and responses". The Dr I have now is really good, actually does tests to see what could be causing the problem, explains things really well and doesn't give me the run around with things like "well try this first and if it doesn't take then I'll give you a perscription..."

          So, because I am spending my money on the service, I will gladly pay MORE out of my HSA for the dr I have now if I needed to (thank god he actually charges me LESS because I us an HSA!) because he is that much better compared to all the other dr's around my area.

          And this is the only way the actual medical CARE we recieve will improve. The problem with an insurance company is they pay regardless of how the service was. And make no mistake, the medical industry is a SERVICE industry, just like automotive, technical, food, Travel and other industries that are service oriented. Most people have bad medical experiences because there is no repercussion to the medical facility if the service was bad. They still get paid by the insurance company regardless of whether you are "happy" with the level of care you got or not. And with more and more doctors banding together into huge medical "groups", there is no way to get around some of these "groups" that just flat out neglect their patients.

          By taking the insurance company out of the equation for the small stuff, you are increasing the competition for your business between medical offices. And since YOU are the one paying, you can refuse to pay if the care sucks, or choose never to go back. And as more people do that to a poor service provider they'll go out of business or shape up!

          Anyway... these are just my thoughts and opinions.

            #7.3 - Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:15 PM EDT
            WakeUpPeople-1385514

            Also, just think of the financial ramifications if several hundred million people opened HSA bank accounts across the country and started investing that money from their HSA as well!?

            The banks would have a lot MORE money in their reserves that they can use to loan against...and so they would start lending more... and the industries like housing, small businesses, and automotive sales that have been hurting because of the financial meltdown would start to recover since the banks would have the ability to lend money again.

            Out of all the "proposals" I've heard to "stimulate" the economy, this is the only one that really makes sense and could potentially "kill two birds with one stone".

              #7.4 - Fri Aug 20, 2010 2:19 PM EDT
              Reply
              Leave a Comment:
              You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
              You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
              (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
              Newsvine Privacy Statement
              As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
              FUN STUFF:
              • Leaderboard |
              • E-Mail Alerts |
              • Top of the Vine |
              • Newsvine Live |
              • Newsvine Archives |
              • The Greenhouse |
              COMPANY STUFF:
              • Code of Honor |
              • Company Info |
              • Contact Us |
              • Jobs |
              • User Agreement |
              • Privacy Policy |
              • About our ads
              LEGAL STUFF:
              • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
              • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com